Developmental controversy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Screening for prostate cancer: Controversy? What controversy?
for the absence of a reduction in mortality in the plco trial and in comparison with the difference seen in the erspc trial. The truth of the matter is the psa test should not be used at all in screening for prostate cancer in the manner it has heretofore been used. Prostate-specific antigen, discovered in 1970 5,6 , is a normal component of the prostate. It is not cancer-specific. Rather, it i...
متن کاملA developmental perspective on the controversy surrounding the use of SSRIs to treat pediatric depression.
Editorial ajp.psychiatryonline.org Si nce the 1990s, there has been at least a 3-to 5-fold increase in the prevalence of an-tidepressant treatment for U.S. youths aged 2–19 years (1). Although children over the age of 10 were the most likely to receive prescriptions for antidepressants, this increase has been observed across all age groups. For example, Zito et al. (2) documented that, from 199...
متن کاملRebel Without Applause : Richard Goldschmidt , Developmental Genetics and the Sex - Determination Controversy
With the recent mapping of the human genome, scientists have dramatically increased their ability to explain inheritance patterns. Yet, even so, developmental genetics remains relatively elusive. The discrepancy between these two approaches to genetics is not a new divide in the research community. Richard Goldschmidt is one scientist in the past who attempted to bridge this divide. As a German...
متن کاملFuelling controversy
The US President’s annual State of the Union speech is a favorite place to unveil new initiatives. For the past several months there has been a buzz that President George W. Bush would say something dramatic about climate change. “Buzz” in Washington can mean political trial balloons, genuine leaks or simply wishful thinking. It took a while to sort out the truth in this case. The week before t...
متن کاملRetraction Controversy
In the September 23, 2005 issue, Cell published a re-traction of a 2004 paper from Nitz et al. on heritable integration of parasite DNA into host genomes. This was a very unusual situation in which the paper was retracted by the journal rather than by the authors of the paper. The decision to retract the paper came after a year of careful consideration and extensive correspondence with both the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/259610a0